Trump's New Retirement Plan Aims to Expand Access for Millions

John NadaBy John Nada·Feb 25, 2026·4 min read
Trump's New Retirement Plan Aims to Expand Access for Millions

Trump's new retirement plan aims to provide universal savings accounts and government matching, targeting millions without employer-sponsored plans.

President Donald Trump has proposed a new retirement plan that could provide universal savings accounts for workers without access to employer-sponsored plans, offering a government match of up to $1,000 annually. This initiative targets the approximately 56 million Americans lacking such benefits, aiming to narrow the gap in retirement savings access. During his recent State of the Union address, Trump highlighted that half of working Americans still do not have access to retirement plans with matching contributions. He characterized this situation as a 'gross disparity' and announced that his administration would give these often-forgotten workers access to the same type of retirement plan available to federal employees.

The proposed accounts would function similarly to the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) used by federal employees, which allows for low-cost, index-based investment choices. While specifics on tax treatment are pending, the TSP model suggests contributions might be tax-advantaged, potentially benefiting a diverse range of workers. The implications of this proposal are significant, especially for low-income workers who often lack retirement savings options. According to research, nearly 80% of those without employer-sponsored plans earn less than $53,000 per year.

The plan could help many, particularly in demographic groups that traditionally face barriers to retirement savings, such as young, female, or minority workers. Notably, 63% of Hispanic workers and 52% of Black workers currently lack access to workplace retirement savings. Experts express cautious optimism regarding the proposal's potential impact. It is seen as a step toward universal coverage for retirement savings, enabling previously excluded workers to begin accumulating retirement funds.

Teresa Ghilarducci, a professor at The New School, remarked that the new account would be a 'meaningful step to get universal coverage' for retirement savings. However, critical details remain, such as how the accounts will be structured and whether they will allow for emergency withdrawals, which many workers may need. The mechanics of the proposed accounts are still being fleshed out. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested that the law could be passed through reconciliation, similar to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

This process could result in key provisions shifting as the legislation moves through Congress. The new retirement accounts would be portable, allowing workers to retain their savings even when switching jobs, a significant advantage for the modern workforce. Additionally, the proposal's relationship to existing welfare programs raises questions. Some low-income Americans rely on Supplemental Security Income (SSI), which has strict asset limits.

If the new retirement accounts are designed to avoid impacting these limits, it could help integrate more workers into the savings system without jeopardizing their current benefits. Retirement experts like Jason Fichtner stress the importance of ensuring that the new accounts do not detract from existing social welfare programs that assist lower-income individuals. The new accounts are part of a broader trend toward increasing retirement savings across the nation. Currently, 17 states have enacted legislation to create automatic IRA plans for workers without employer plans, allowing them to save for retirement.

These initiatives, although varied, reflect a growing recognition of the need for accessible retirement savings. Previous efforts, like the myRA program, have faced challenges and were ultimately discontinued after 18 months—a situation that advocates argue was due to insufficient time for the program to take root. Getting more Americans to save for retirement is not just a personal finance issue; it has substantial implications for the broader economy and government spending. A 2023 study by Pew Charitable Trusts indicated that under-saving could cost governments $1.3 trillion over 20 years.

By enabling workers to save even modest amounts monthly, the proposal could help alleviate future financial burdens on social welfare systems. As the proposal evolves, lawmakers will need to focus on ensuring that the new accounts truly serve their purpose without detracting from existing support systems. The details surrounding the $1,000 government match, the enrollment process, and the specific features of the accounts will be crucial in determining the plan's effectiveness. Experts suggest that lawmakers should consider how to ensure portfolios are diversified and whether the accounts will allow outside contributions.

KC Boas, from the Aspen Institute Financial Security Program, emphasized the importance of creating an easy way for families to get started with retirement savings. She noted the necessity of addressing whether the accounts would permit emergency withdrawals, as many current retirement accounts are frequently treated as de facto emergency savings vehicles, which can adversely affect retirement balances. The Trump administration's proposal could draw on existing efforts to encourage more workers to save for retirement. Automatic IRA plans, which allow employees without employer-sponsored plans to save, have already shown promise in several states.

These state-level initiatives have allowed approximately 1.17 million savers to accumulate close to $2.8 billion in assets over the past eight years, highlighting the potential for broader implementation at the federal level.

Scroll to load more articles