Trump Administration to End Immigration Enforcement Surge in Minnesota
By John Nada·Feb 12, 2026·5 min read
The Trump administration will end its immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota amid reduced tensions and public protests. Commitment to immigration enforcement remains unchanged.
The Trump administration will conclude its immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota following a significant reduction in enforcement targets, according to Tom Homan, the White House 'Border Czar.' Homan announced that the number of federal officers deployed in the Twin Cities has been greatly reduced, with a notable drawdown of personnel including a 25% pullback from the area.
During a press conference held at the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building on February 4, 2026, Homan provided insights into the operational changes. "We've seen a big change here in the last couple of weeks," he stated, emphasizing that these changes were all positive. The operation, dubbed 'Operation Metro Surge,' was initiated amid heightened tensions following the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens by federal agents. The deaths of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti in separate altercations in January had significantly inflamed public sentiment against the aggressive immigration enforcement tactics employed by the Trump administration.
The backlash from these incidents prompted widespread protests throughout Minnesota, as communities expressed their disapproval of the actions taken by ICE and local law enforcement. Homan noted that the federal agents' presence in the region, which had dramatically increased since December, saw thousands of officers from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agencies deployed in the Twin Cities. Following the protests and negative public opinion, Homan's recent announcement signaled a shift in strategy. He confirmed that the federal government would reduce the number of enforcement targets in the area, allowing for a more collaborative approach with local authorities.
Homan revealed that the drawdown of 700 agents from the area encompassing Minneapolis and St. Paul was part of this revised strategy, representing a roughly 25% reduction in personnel that still left about 2,000 officers in place. The total withdrawal of federal agents was set to continue into the following week, indicating that the administration was taking steps to ease tensions and restore community trust.
In his remarks, Homan also mentioned the importance of maintaining a "small footprint" of personnel in the area for a period of time. This would allow for a smoother transition back to local field offices and ensure that any potential "agitator activity" did not resurface. His comments highlighted the administration's awareness of the delicate balance required in immigration enforcement practices as it relates to public sentiment and community safety.
The conclusion of 'Operation Metro Surge' was announced shortly after President Trump deployed Homan to Minnesota to oversee the expansive deportation mission. This change in leadership followed the controversial incidents that had escalated tensions in the region, prompting a need for a revised operational approach. Homan's take on the situation included an emphasis on the improved cooperation between federal and local leaders, showcasing a strategic pivot from aggressive enforcement to one that prioritizes collaboration.
"With that, and success that has been made arresting public safety threats and other priorities since this surge operation began, as well as the unprecedented levels of coordination we have obtained from state officials and local law enforcement, I have proposed, and President Trump has concurred, that this surge operation conclude," Homan explained. This collaborative framework marks a significant departure from previous enforcement strategies, illustrating the administration's responsiveness to the community's concerns.
Despite the conclusion of this specific surge operation, Homan reassured the public that the Trump administration's commitment to immigration enforcement remains firm. He stated that efforts to remove undocumented immigrants would continue, indicating that while the approach may change, the underlying policy aims would not. "For those who say we are backing down from immigration enforcement or the promise of mass deportations, you are simply wrong," he asserted, underscoring the administration's steadfast position on immigration policy.
The dynamic nature of immigration policies under the Trump administration is further highlighted by the context of this decision. The administration has faced numerous challenges in implementing its policies, often encountering pushback from advocacy groups, local governments, and the general public. This latest move reflects an ongoing negotiation between federal mandates and local realities, suggesting that enforcement strategies may continue to evolve in response to public sentiment.
As the situation in Minnesota unfolds, observers will likely continue to monitor the effects of this operational shift on both immigration enforcement outcomes and community relations. The ramifications of the administration's policies are complex and multifaceted, particularly in a state like Minnesota, which has a diverse population and a history of both welcoming immigrants and grappling with the challenges of enforcement.
The decision to conclude 'Operation Metro Surge' could signal a wider trend in the administration's approach to immigration enforcement as it seeks to balance its goals with the realities of public opinion. As Tom Homan emphasized in his remarks, the commitment to immigration enforcement remains unchanged, which suggests that while tactics may adapt, the core objectives of the Trump administration's immigration policy will persist.
This development serves as a crucial reminder of the evolving landscape of immigration enforcement in America. Stakeholders, including local communities, advocacy groups, and governmental entities, will need to navigate this landscape thoughtfully and collaboratively to address the complexities surrounding immigration in the United States. The ongoing dialogue between federal and local authorities will be essential in shaping the future of immigration enforcement and ensuring that community safety and public trust are prioritized amid evolving policies.
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.